As a reviewer, I will deduct ½-1 point when I find a number of typos and errors/inconsistencies. Thinking on it the other day, I questioned whether this was fair, given that it can really be the editor’s fault and not the writer’s.
But is it really? As a writer, I do my best to catch all typos and inconsistencies in a manuscript, but given I’m human, I might not necessarily capture them all. As an editor, I do my best to catch all typos and inconsistencies in a manuscript, but given I’m human, I might not necessarily capture them all.
The editor in me will honestly confess that it sometimes irks me when I receive a manuscript abundant with errors, some so glaring and numerous it makes me wince. It suggests the writer completed one draft and didn’t give a fig about revising or editing. Perhaps he/she knew there’d be an editor, so why bother or worry? Who needs to sweat the small stuff, right? The manuscript was completed; that’s all that matters. That’s fine, I suppose. But what if said editor is good but not great? What happens then?
This brings me back to previous posts re the importance of proofing and editing our own work. Most writers find it a tiresome if not daunting task, and I get that. But consider it this way: it’s a valuable way [practice] to augment writing skills. The more we edit and rework—polish—the more we learn and develop. And the less we have to rely on someone else to “perfect” our product. There’s a certain degree of pride in that, don’t you think?
Today, thanks to world of e-publishing, anyone and everyone can be an author . . . which is wonderful, because traditional publishing of yesteryear made the book world a very difficult realm to break into. Yet it can also lend itself to a certain apathy, where the standard of professionalism seems less critical (that’s another post, my friends).
Conclusion? Deductions will continue . . . as will counsel re the virtues of self-editing and augmenting our skills.
5 thoughts on “1 Point Here, ½ Point There”
You make excellent points. I think it comes down to how skilled a writer is at certain tasks. I suffer from missing things in my own work because my memory kicks in. I try to read more slowly, but if I’ve read the same paragraph 4 or 5 times, I actually can’t see the errors anymore. My eyes and brain correct it… so I often find issues and think “how did I miss that?”
In my latest one, I thought I’d caught almost everything… between a few beta readers, they found ~35 typos, and I almost cried over my foolishness to miss them… I’ve found if I put it down and come back to it in 2 weeks, I forget enough detail that I find the errors again, so now I include that practice in my editing / writing.
I don’t know how you do it for a living! TALENT!
Talent? Maybe just a keen eye. I edit my own stuff – copiously. And you know? There’ll still be errors/typos. I “see” what I believe is there. As you said, “my eyes and brain correct it”. The important thing is we give it our best. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, you are quite talented!!!
Thank you kind sir. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry I was away for a while.🌹